Construction of inimputability's judgement. An analysis from the pragmatic one

Authors

  • Catalina Pulido Universidad Externado de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60007/antistio.4764

Keywords:

Inimputability, Expert test, Consults psychiatric legal, Pragmatic conversational cognitive, conversational analysis, criminality, insanity, modernity

Abstract

The research problem is about the construction process of imputability judgement, while on the forensic psychiatric interview. It has like main resource of observation, the discourse emitted by each one of the parts, making understandable the interaction between the legal psychiatrist expert and the accused. The cognitive pragmatic analysis of the conversation is the methodology to make a treatment of data of the conversation that has been recorded on video. With these records, was done an interlineal transcription of each examination, where were consigned the enunciations of the speakers, the expression's way of these enunciations, which is the prosody; and the body language of the speakers. In the same way, the researcher made an ethnographic registration with field notes, while she was observed the examination through the camera of Gessel. The conversational analysis kept in mind three categories: actional, thematic, referential; that permitted to make reflections around the interaction on the examination, the use of words in context, and the relationship between the speakers meanings in the conversation, making possible to observe the constitution of turn - taking sequences. Furthermore it was analyzed as a document, the expert report done by the legal psychiatrist, from its shape, content, and context. It allowed to understand its nature and useful in Colombian forensic psychiatry, and to contribute to the comprehension of the imputability judgement in a cultural context.

Author Biography

Catalina Pulido, Universidad Externado de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia

Antropóloga - Universidad Externado de Colombia. Bogotá - Colombia.

References

DE FORNEL, Michel. Le sens de la conversation. Eléments de pragmatique cognitive.2000

DE FORNEL, Michel y LÉON, Jacqueline. L'analyse de conversation, de I'ethnométhodologie á la linguistique interactionnelle. EHESS, UMR CNRS 7597.

DURANTI, Alessandro. Antropología lingüística. Cambridge University Press. Madrid 2000.

GUBER, Rosana. La etnografía, método, campo y reflexividad. Grupo Editorial Norma, Colombia, 1991.

HEERLEIN, Andrés. Miembro del Comité Editorial. Revista Chilena de Neuropsiquiatría. Santiago, apr. 2004. Desafíos en Psiquiatría; vol. 42 No. 2.

JEFFERSON, Gail; SACKS, Harvey y SCHE- GLOFF, Emanuel. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language. 1974;Vol. 50, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243

PÉREZ, Luis Carlos. Tratado de Derecho Penal. Tomo I. Ed. Temis, 1975, Bogotá, p. 779.

PORTER, ROY. Breve historia de la locura. Turner, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2003.

PORTER, ROY. Breve historia de la Medicina, de la antigüedad hasta nuestros días Taurus, 2004.

RESTREPO FONTALVO, Jorge. Criminología Forum Pacis, 1993.

REYES ECHANDÍA, Alfonso. Manual de Derecho Penal. Bogotá: Temis, 1991.

REYES ECHANDÍA, Alfonso. Derecho Penal. Parte general. 9a edición. 1984. Universidad Externado de Colombia.

REYES ECHANDÍA, Alfonso. Criminología. Universidad Externado de Colombia, 1984.

ROBLEDO, Emilio. La Medicina en los departamentos antioqueños. En: Repertorio histórico de la Academia Antioqueña de Historia fundada en 1903. Año 6-enero de 1924ns 1-2.

RORTY, Richard. El giro lingüístico. Dificultades metafilosófica de la filosofía lingüística. Ediciones Paidós. Fondo de Cultura Económica de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.

ROSEBERRY, William. Anthropologies and Histories. Balinese Cockfight and the seduction of Anthropology.

SOLÓRZANO NIÑO, Roberto. Psiquiatría Clínica y Forense. Ed. Temis. Bogotá - Colombia, 1990.

SAMPEDRO ARRUBLA. Ciencias Jurídicas. Estado Social y Democrático de Derecho y la Inimputabilidad. Santa Fe de Bogotá, D. C., Fundación Cultural Javeriana de Artes Gráficas. 1970.

URBANO MARTÍNEZ, José Joaquín. Política Criminal y Dogmática Penal. En: Procuraduría General de la Nación. Instituto de Estudios del Ministerio Público. Memorias 2. Jornadas de Reflexión en Derecho Penal Colombiano. 2001; 37.

VAN DIJK, Teun A. La ciencia del texto. Barcelona, Buenos Aires. 1978.

VAN DIJK, Teun A. De la gramática del texto al análisis crítico del discurso. Universidad de Amsterdam.

W. Mayer Gross. Psiquiatría Clínica. Tomo I Ed. Paidós Buenos Aires, impresión 1958.

WACQUANT, Loïc y BOURDIEU, Pierre. Una invitación a la sociología reflexiva. Siglo XXI Editores. Argentina. 2005.

How to Cite

1.
Pulido C. Construction of inimputability’s judgement. An analysis from the pragmatic one. Antistio Rev. Cient. INMLCF Colomb. [Internet]. 2008 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 Dec. 5];20(3):29-34. Available from: https://revistasforensesmedicinalegalgovco.biteca.online/index.php/an/article/view/4764

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2008-12-31